skylark Posted July 2, 2018 Report Share Posted July 2, 2018 Yes--it was more about making good taper contacts which I made several (in conjunction with other recordings). find anything interesting worth mentioning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickled Dog Posted July 2, 2018 Report Share Posted July 2, 2018 jesus... this takes me back... this was mythical shit. i never thought the full version of this would see the light of day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ihggy-GP Posted July 3, 2018 Report Share Posted July 3, 2018 Did any of you idiots ever even read up on in ear monitors cabinessence 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoserama Posted July 3, 2018 Report Share Posted July 3, 2018 I did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickled Dog Posted July 3, 2018 Report Share Posted July 3, 2018 Listened to the whole thing at work today. Thanks for sharing the full thing. I'm traumatised by the fact this is 12 years ago. Same year I joined this board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helter Skelter Posted July 4, 2018 Report Share Posted July 4, 2018 Did any of you idiots ever even read up on in ear monitors Was assuming this was a group project and Mugsy would do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jethro Posted July 5, 2018 Report Share Posted July 5, 2018 If I do will it tell me that the audio going through the in ear monitors is not an output from the mixing board? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoserama Posted July 5, 2018 Report Share Posted July 5, 2018 Sigh. Ear Monitors are special mixes designed for the band to hear themselves while they're playing. So Thom's feed is mixed with higher amounts of his vocals and guitar, whereas Ed has more of his vocals and guitar. Since it's broadcasted over FM, you can dial into their frequencies and record. Like this recording. Or the Berkeley 2017 recording that it was paired with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helter Skelter Posted July 5, 2018 Report Share Posted July 5, 2018 Sigh. Ear Monitors are special mixes designed for the band to hear themselves while they're playing. So Thom's feed is mixed with higher amounts of his vocals and guitar, whereas Ed has more of his vocals and guitar. Since it's broadcasted over FM, you can dial into their frequencies and record. Like this recording. Or the Berkeley 2017 recording that it was paired with. Huh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jethro Posted July 8, 2018 Report Share Posted July 8, 2018 Sigh. Ear Monitors are special mixes designed for the band to hear themselves while they're playing. So Thom's feed is mixed with higher amounts of his vocals and guitar, whereas Ed has more of his vocals and guitar. Since it's broadcasted over FM, you can dial into their frequencies and record. Like this recording. Or the Berkeley 2017 recording that it was paired with. Genuinely, excuse my ignorance - I had no idea this was a thing! I'm tempted to say that, combined with proper noise cancelling earpieces, it would be a better way to listen to most concerts! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helter Skelter Posted July 8, 2018 Report Share Posted July 8, 2018 Genuinely, excuse my ignorance - I had no idea this was a thing! I'm tempted to say that, combined with proper noise cancelling earpieces, it would be a better way to listen to most concerts! Yeah and if it’s all over FM - what is the radius of the signal? That said - could I be out in a parking lot and tune in? Does the signal change? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoserama Posted July 8, 2018 Report Share Posted July 8, 2018 It's a lot trickier than it seems. If you really want to do it, go buy a radio scanner and try. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bedroomghost Posted August 4, 2018 Report Share Posted August 4, 2018 It's not going to sound like that on the album because Radiohead will turn it into some electronic trickery. I love the Banjo and the organic sound of the song. I want an Organic Radiohead album where it's full on just live sounding without any studio trickery. I wish Radiohead were more into releasing an acoustic/live version of their songs in addition but I can't fault them for not wanting to. That live version without all the drunken hollering of Gagging Order was so damn warm and beautiful. Why can't Nigel or somebody capture that in soundboard quality and release it. I would buy it in a heartbeat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helter Skelter Posted August 4, 2018 Report Share Posted August 4, 2018 I want an Organic Radiohead album where it's full on just live sounding without any studio trickery. I wish Radiohead were more into releasing an acoustic/live version of their songs in addition but I can't fault them for not wanting to. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZfwA9WT--S0 There’s plenty of that out there, no? 2 from the basement recordings I Might Be Wrong Praha/Astoria/Haiti shows Radiohead are too atmospheric and kraut rock inspired to do a full on raw acoustic and or live thing. And frankly I think if they stripped it all down - it would make for a boring LP10 - comparable to everything they’ve done to this point. The one off acoustic songs are fine, but if I want 8-10 straight songs of that i turn on Harvest Moon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seabutter Posted August 5, 2018 Report Share Posted August 5, 2018 I wish Radiohead were the opposite of what you want. they're are, already? cool, thanks come again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now