Jump to content

kafka.

Moderators
  • Content Count

    21,809
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

kafka. last won the day on April 22 2010

kafka. had the most liked content!

About kafka.

  • Rank
    I'm tied to you, you're tied to me
  • Birthday 07/08/1987

Contact Methods

  • AIM
    m0dest me
  • MSN
    zach_man11@hotmail.com
  • Website URL
    http://www.it'snotmagicitstimetravel.com

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Occupation
    Franz Kafkaographer
  • Favorite Radiohead Song
    The one about Franz Kafka
  • Favorite Radiohead Album
    LP8 - Metamorphiohead
  • Other bands you like
    Kings of Kafka
    Czeching on Kafka
    Kafka and the Bitter Cough
    Cough Caw
  1. kafka.

    GGREEN

    see you, mt. it's been great.
  2. kafka.

    GGREEN

    the us vs. them that I see are fans who don't want to post in this forum vs. fans who are fine using it. we're talking about a very logical rule: a certain type of art belongs here, and that's the purpose for having this forum. now we're looking at a possible exception to this rule, and I don't see any reason for it. I can see a case for someone posting chrisflew's music in OM, for example, because he's actually gone. Cab isn't. as for Danny, he's about as close as a fan here gets to being actually local to the band instead of just local to the website. This isn't someone who likes a band who happens to post here, and happened to post his music here. A really great counter example are all the friends of bands who come here and go to this forum to plug their friend's band. On their judgment, they pick this forum. Because it makes the most sense! And they don't try to set themselves apart from YA. Freedom, division, special treatment... how about we just say, YA art belongs in YA? And if a YA artist really turns his or her back on this place, really disowns us, never gives us anymore of the art before other outlets get it first, never drops in and gives us direct news on the art (we don't get that in other forums, do we?), then sure, they're not classified as YA art anymore and we'll discuss their art in their absence in the right forums outside of here. But let's just be direct and admit this deciding factor: Cab is still here. now let's not give anyone special treatment.
  3. kafka.

    GGREEN

    I don't think there's much difference in the artist wanting to leave YA and the fans wanting to do that for them. I can come up with an easy definition of YA art, for both fans and artists: any art you would not have found on your own if it weren't for the fact the art was posted here, whether you saw it directly or another MTer linked you to it, or any art that you had something to do with making. With this definition comes: YA art belongs in YA. In both nordheim and cab's cases, would we have their art or know about their art if they had not posted it here at some time? No. It would make some difference with me if the artist definitely looked like they were gone for good. I think it would be fair game to post in OM if someone found chrisflew's music because of its wide circulation and attention out there, and not because he gave it to Irene or someone to deliver it to us. Even so, it would be something of a shame if us YA fans missed getting a nice blast from the past because we check YA more than OM (definitely true for me). YA would be dead if it weren't for the fact that we also have fans (or just critics) around to discuss the art. So, why take some of those discussions away from here, from us? To forums that we don't frequent as often? Why not bring up nordheim's art in the Longest thread here, the Checking Out at the Moment thread, or just a thread you start in the forum where his art is, to catch his attention or further comment on his art to the nice crowd of critics and fans we've developed here? Or bump one of his threads here. What's the point in bringing the discussion to the Arts Forum, where the artist himself might miss it? Why try to claim that much ownership over where his (or her?) art is circulated here, when he's the one who brought it to us in the first place? Eh, it just steals from all the often thankless work we do being critics, commentators, and fans here. Doing things unasked, like soliciting YA music to play on radioshows? Where else could RelyingOnYourVote's thread belong? And honestly, there's only so much self-promotion you want to do. You want to introduce your art, see if you hook some fans, and then know you've got your audience and you don't have to plug your next piece like you're looking for a favor when someone replies. This forum would be an ugly place if fandom wasn't a part of it. Let's not chop that up.
  4. kafka.

    GGREEN

    he's been back since the summer. and posting in this thread.
  5. kafka.

    GGREEN

    I was hoping this wouldn't be a discussion. I don't see anyone's opinion being swayed too much one way or the other. But a boundary needs to be set because we need a system of dividing Your Art bands who stay in YA and the ones who get to graduate to OM. My preferred system is: don't divide them at all. It's the clearest boundary. It's the fairest. It's the most supportive of other musicians here. And it's the most obvious boundary when the musician still posts here. Usually when a band gets big, there's still the hometown pride, right? So even if we try to make an impossibly subjective cutoff point for when a musician here gets big, why would getting away from where they started posting their music be some sort of reward or rite of passage? Cab already stated he doesn't give a shit, so let's just look at the relationship of fans to your art music. Your Art requires fans to exist as a forum at all. Without them it would be thousands of threads with 0 replies. So this isn't a question of self-promotion, it's a question of, again, coming up with that subjective cutoff point so we can let the fans leave Your Art. Here's what I'd recommend. Your Art has some incredible music, a good deal of it. And it can make up a significant part of what you listen to. OM is pretty much about sharing what you listen to, and your opinions. So I'd say, yeah, circulate YA music around OM. Add them to your annual top albums list. If they have youtube videos, post that in the Song You're Feeling youtube thread. Or the Longest thread, the all-purpose gigs thread, etc. etc. etc. Maybe even make a thread that's something like, "OMers who listen to YA music, but don't seem to talk about it with other OMers so here's our OM thread to talk about YA music in general" and that might even channel traffic over to YA. But, eh, I don't think that thread would be too necessary. The point would be: you don't have to hide or discount the YA part of your music when you're discussing what you listen to as a whole in a different forum existing for that purpose. But if we're strictly focusing on a single YA band, our thoughts on them, experiences, getting the new album, seeing them live, why do you want to divide yourself from other YA fans talking about other YA bands? And that hometown thing. If a musician here gets enough attention that a poster on another message board hears about them from a chance show or pitchfork or something like that, let those message boards put their threads in their OM forums. But here, let's be really happy that a YA band is getting that much attention, but also have enough pride in YA to know that's where they started (or one of the places where they started). We got to hear them first. One of the band members (most likely the main one) still posts here and we get the inside stories. So uh, yeah. Let's stick together. C'mon.
  6. always knew those two would be full of farts and ADD
  7. sorry for the slow response. it's been ages since I've reviewed anything here. or at least anything long at all. unemployed vs. employed makes a huge difference when it comes to an online social life. but let's get to it. first, name change? Empire Machines isn't bad. Maybe a little cold. but it works. Now, the site feels so official. Don't like that on instinct. Feels like there's a lot of money behind you, men in suits sort of thing. Mailing list? So what's the planning behind that? I definitely respect someone with the time and energy (and money, yeah) to make something more serious, fulfill potential. There's always the risk of going too far with it and losing something essential, but I don't think that's happened here. It just makes me curious what your goal is. Largely because my goal is so so low, and it's a relieving thing for me. I remember you getting some amazingly good pay for a gig. I do envy that. Of course, there would pressure to fulfill such a price. On to the music. It comes close to embellishment, but really I think this is more about hearing what you hear in your head and having the ability to get all of that out. Plenty of films and music etc. have to skimp on what they can't deliver because of a budget, time, whatever. I say close, but not embellished. Very nice, really. Never Enough - drums are a little too perfect here, to go against what I was saying earlier. But the keyboard is a huge payoff to this hi-fi. Love it. Vocal snippet at 1:17ish, and other similar touches, is great. That took a lot of time to get all of this in, yeah? Tweaking. Guitar riffage and vocal break at 3:00ish is great. Niiice drum buildup there. No more too perfect reaction. Song doesn't get me emotionally though. That's maybe the biggest problem for me, and it's not too big. Just I suppose the marker, limit for how much I can get out of the songs no matter how much they've reached potential. There's at least one lyric that gets me though, coming up. Sweet Teeth - Acoustic guitar and bass make for a great combo at 1:30~, oh, and the backup vocals get that hits-at-once sound. The "hey, ey ey"s are one of the top standouts on the EP for me. Great there. Ah, lyrics I think are the hardest part, and I've got to say I wish there were more lines that got me at the gut. Lyrics here are casual, the cadence, it's like, you can't question it because it sounds so natural, which means the words sneak by. Run and hide is great musically, but lyrically doesn't reach me. But hey, it's Muse-esque and I can't say Muse does anything wrong for what they do. Motif riff at 1:24 is good. Angular. That sort of not-lazy Modest Mouse approach to guitar. And those guitar bits on the side make it great. Heavy blunt crunch into phaser-like thing. Very nice. Shift at 2:40~, very very nice there. Dog Eat Dog - Muse thing again. Interesting since we're looking at two different songwriters with this and Sweet Teeth. Hahaha, the way you sing 'bitch' the first time is great, as much as it's a turn-off to hear that word unless it's well-justified. But it's great that first time, because I hear a comical edge. Instrumental lead to 1:53, when the vocals start up again, = appreciation for that interlude not being boring/filler. Made good use. Ending's good. Soft ending again. Sweet Teeth's ending was a tiny bit hammed up, not this one though. Panda Thief - a bit of an obligatory experimental track. And a little non-committed to the concept because past the weirder opening, it sounds more like just a section to a song where the other sections are missing. I feel like the right channel guitar for example, can be heard at 1:54 and throughout, should be doing something more to dominate the song on such an interlude song. Less jammage and tracks sticking to their corners of the studio, and more dominance is what I'd like. But it's still good for what it decides to do. That lurch in the keyboard at the end, cool. Burning Ties - probably my favorite. Hard to say because there's stiff competition in terms of the hi-fi, this thing you've carefully crafted and packed full, and it's the strong suit of this EP, vs. the fact that this song has that lyric that actually gets to me, "burning ties is not a crime". Resonates with me. Because fuck, I have plenty of ties I've burnt and ties I've wanted to burn, but it's an action that you can easily let define who you are. Either way you choose, really. Groove at 2:40~ I've always been a fan of. The abrupt end here is the only one that's noticeable as abrupt. Makes me question whether it's too abrupt, unlike my reactions to the other songs. Could be just fine with it on further listens. Definitely hearing a Radiohead snippet in that metallic caterwauling of guitar. Lemme see if I can find it... well, i guess I was hearing some mix of Pull/Pulk and Electioneering's outros, where Burning Ties' ending would have fit. well, that was quite a positive review I think.
  8. a solid 9.7, good live performances this past year. would see again next year.
  9. hmmmmmmmm well, I thought Thom could've been more articulate about climate change on colbert. aaaaahhh hummmmmm... Ed hasn't made a solo record yet? second on the slow output lately but eh, can hardly blame them. how do you categorize I Might Be Wrong then?
  10. nothing at all artful in capturing this (average intelligence cell phone), but I like that I managed to get it before being rushed out of the parking lot. there's something artful in capturing a sight at all, right? the pictures in here are always amazing. overwhelming.
  11. I kind of did that. $400 paloma picasso necklace (and earrings?) at tiffany's. oh, the stupid things you do when you have paychecks and no overheads. working on a time machine. so I can get those paychecks with no overheads again.
  12. eeeaaasy: good question, cool person. hey wait, do you want to tell me your open mic history up to the present? cause I'd love to read that.
×
×
  • Create New...