Jump to content

funnyHAHA

Members
  • Content Count

    1,760
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About funnyHAHA

  • Rank
    funnyhow
  • Birthday 08/23/1979

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    https://soundcloud.com/solar-flares

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Favorite Radiohead Album
    Hail To The Thief
  1. so because of the themes that are within her album, that alone makes it exempt from a lawsuit? because it's about addiction and depression? do you realize how fucking stupid and childish you sound? also- this isn't about censorship you fucking mindless twat. you clearly don't even understand what censorship is. lol dude your ignorance and lack of critical thinking skills are astounding. you don't get to decide when an artist is allowed to sue another artist. it's not your call. you're just a judgmental, ignorant, whiny little shit who's making absurd, baseless, hysterical and hyperbolic remarks. you're obviously a troll, your account is brand new and you appeared as this news was breaking on this forum. stupid fucking alias. this is why the radiohead subreddit is so much better than MT. it's not nearly as trollish, cliquish and juvenile.
  2. out of line? and who are you or anyone else here to make that call? it's not your fucking art so mind your own fucking business. no one here is in any position to say whether or not the lawsuit is just.
  3. The score is absolutely majestic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCNsHSJrn9M
  4. lol no offense taken. this is a radiohead forum after all.
  5. ok bud. it's funny... lol one of my close friends and i were just talking about this the other day. he's a massive Radiohead fan but he hates the fans. he's always amused that i interact with them and has a good laugh when he sees that i get annoyed by some of them. for years he's always maintained that Radiohead fans are assholes- and you're frankly evidence of that. As are a handful of other people on this board. ah well. i may come off as angry in these threads but it's more just shock and amusement......its always funny when people assume tone of voice. anyway. carry on. oh and that pitchfork article just proves my point that many people were jumping the gun and being judgmental twats.
  6. ditto. it's also cute how you always appear in threads when it comes to slagging on the band.
  7. oh and by the way, here's the latest update: https://pitchfork.com/news/radiohead-havent-sued-lana-del-rey-publishers-say/?mbid=social_facebook so, yeah. all you whiny, judgmental brats jumped the gun without knowing any details and thus commenced your knee-jerk reactions. shocking. well any of you admit you were wrong? not likely.
  8. good retort. oh and of course i know about The Hollies. people keep bringing that up in these discussions as if it's relevant. it isn't.
  9. Whatever second video you posted it doesn't play due to privacy settings. Also- seems obvious given that you're "new" here that you're just here to start shit or are an alias.
  10. so a band doesn't have a right to protect their music? what the fuck is wrong with these clueless comments? "and they don't need the money". LOL are you fucking 12? so by that logic, if Radiohead were broke, you'd be ok with this? it has NOTHING to do with needing the money. it's business. it's not right if another artist rips off another artist. There are consequences. whether it's radiohead behind this or the publisher or whomever, it is imperative to protect their music. it blows my mind how judgmental people are being about this without knowing and understanding the business and the legalities of this stuff. "the beginning of the end" lol jesus. bunch of naive, whiny brats.
×
×
  • Create New...