Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Earlier
  2. Sorry, the flac files are definitely still corrupt. The original (and faulty) MD5 data is stored within the flac's STREAMINFO medadata header, so if you have not updated the flacs then you haven't actually fixed anything. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FLAC "CRC checksums are used for identifying corrupted frames when used in a streaming protocol. The file also includes a complete MD5 hash of the raw PCM audio in its STREAMINFO metadata header." Therefore, changing the md5 file doesn't do anything, since that faulty md5 data is already stored withing the flacs. And as you can see, the files are still corrupt, even when processed from a folder with the updated md5 data: So while I do appreciate the effort, the flacs are still corrupt.
  3. Weird - I just double checked and it worked for me. The tracks themselves have not changed - it is the MD5 file that was faulty 👍
  4. Hmm, well I redownloaded the new version of disc 11 and I am still getting the same error messages on tracks 9 and 10. And they appear to be byte identical to the previous version I already had, so I'm not sure you've actually changed anything... Did you maybe forget to include the updated versions in the new zip?
  5. Thanks for alerting me to this. The 'md5 mismatch' is because I failed to update the md5 file after making some minor edits to file. It doesn't have anything to do with the flacs being lossy (though track 10 - 'Street Spirit' (2002-10-27 Bridge School)' is from a lossy source - unfortunately I don't have the original iTunes Store source to provide though and it no longer seems to be available). I've uploaded a fixed version of the full disc zip, and the MD5 file on its own if you want it.
  6. Hi, doese anybody have this gig in Mp3 format please? Thank you.
  7. Disc 11, tracks 9 and 10 give "Failed: md5 mismatch" error when decoding the files. This means the distributed flacs are not byte replicas of the wavs they were sourced from, or in other words, they are lossy. Is this something we are able to fix? Or do we not have access to those original files anymore?
  8. Hi do you have the following gigs in Mp3 format please? 10/04/1996 - WHFS, Omega Studios, Rockville, Maryland, USA 28/10/1995 XFM Studios, London, UK 21/04/1995 Hilversum, Netherlands 04/04/1995 - KCRW Studios, Santa Monica, California 29/06/1993 - New York 15/06/1993 - FNAC Auditorium, Nancy, France 01/05/2006 - The Big Ask Live, Koko, London, UK 18/06/2006 - Sound Opinion Studios, Chicago, Illinois Thank you for considering. 😀
  9. Hi does anyone have the full WHFS studios acoustic gig from April 10th 1996 in Mp3, please? Thank you.
  10. Hi, could you please reupload these songs? Thanks.
  11. i used to use italics for that. and back in the day you could make the text color grey or the text smaller to indicate it was meant as a whisper.
  12. The underlines are meant to express emphasis . . . . . as if I was having an in-person verbal conversation with you.
  13. chill man, the guy can believe what he wants to believe. if you don't agree with him, just appreciate the art that he creates. dont look into the politics.
  14. Ok so I rewatched Totoro for the first time since 2007. It was the last movie I watched before the release of In Rainbows, so it already has a Radiohead association... and this time I noticed a resemblance between one music cue (the end of the track labeled as Not Afraid in the US soundtrack release that’s currently on streaming services) with the piano part of Daydreaming, and also with Defeatist Anthem. I think both artists were copying from Joe Hisaishi. The plot of the mom in the hospital resonates with what was going on in Thom and his kids’ life at the time too, so they may have been intentionally referencing that music. Then again, Hisaishi is also quoting from plenty of pre-existing music in his soundtracks. Basically copyright is stupid and Radiohead would’ve been fine if they just stopped suing other artists.
  15. i wanna do it like they do shit in the movies!
  16. Hmm there was this guy on Atease who also underlined a lot of stuff. Radiohead brings out the underlining tendencies in people. I can just imagine how tasty an obsessive underliner would be to a bear.
  17. I understand why someone might have that perspective. I have hiked without my iPod. But I must be honest . . . . . 99% of the time, it is completely silent on my hikes. For me, the silence is extremely boring. Listening to music is a big part of my adventurous hikes. It enhances my enjoyment of Mother Nature. For comparison . . . . . when I'm at home or when I'm driving or when I'm at the grocery store or when I'm at work . . . . . instead of music, I listen to podcasts (news, sports, movie reviews, etc.) most of the time. When it's time to hike, I cherish the opportunity to listen to a playlist full of different songs. In the wilderness, it's very easy to hear airplanes because it's so fucking quiet. In the wilderness, if I hike without my iPod . . . . . I only hear the rushing water if I am near a river or creek. I rarely hear birds. I sometimes hear squirrels or chipmunks making little noises, warning the forest community that someone has entered the area. But those natural sounds just aren't a big deal to me. Like I said, most of the time it's silent and I find it very boring. Most of my hikes are off-trail . . . . . . I'm constantly stepping over fallen trees and branches. They're everywhere when you hike off-trail in the Rocky Mountains (depending on where you are, of course). I'm bush-whacking through thick under-brush. I'm climbing up and down hills and rocky terrain. It's hard work. I need music to balance out the challenging physical efforts that I'm making. If I'm hiking to a waterfall . . . . . . yes, I remove my earpods when I know I'm getting close to the waterfall. And I keep my earpods off while I am at the waterfall so I can enjoy it. But when I leave the waterfall, it's back to the music as I struggle through long arduous terrain. As far as bears are concerned . . . . . most of the time, animals hear us, see us or smell us . . . . . before we see them. And since most animals see us as a potential threat to their safety . . . . . or they just feel uncomfortable if we get too close . . . . . most of the time, they move out of the area before we arrive . . . . . . and we don't even know that the animals were there. I've been on long hikes and didn't see one animal . . . . . except for some ravens flying or squirrels/chipmunks. And those hikes are very disappointing because my greatest passion is seeing wildlife in their natural habitat. I especially love seeing wildlife when they are unaware of my presence but that is rare. It is possible that I could surprise a bear and that the bear could charge me and kill me. For example, if I'm hiking near a creek . . . . . and the rushing water is loud enough that a bear doesn't hear the sound of my boots stepping on twigs and branches that are on the ground. And maybe the bear can't smell me because the wind is not blowing the right direction. And maybe the bear can't see me because of the terrain, the trees or the thick bushes. All of those things could happen. But regardless of whatever the situation is . . . . . if a bear charges me, I will use my bear spray (pepper spray). It is clipped to the front of my backpack strap on my chest area . . . . . it's easy and ready to use. In 20 years of hiking . . . . . I have rarely seen bears. And when I have seen a bear, it was usually at a safe distance. In Yellowstone National Park, there are 3 animals that you need to keep a safe distance from: 1. bears (Black Bears and Grizzly Bears) 2. bison 3. moose Bears could kill you and eat you. But remember, less than 10 people have been killed by bears during the entire history of Yellowstone National Park (which was established in 1872). Bison and moose could charge you if you get too close to them and they could kill you because they are so big and heavy . . . . . but they will not eat you. Wolves are not a threat to us because they see us as a threat. They might be curious about us but they don't see us a source of food. As far as mountain lions are concerned, there are very few of them because their territories are extremely large. Like wolves, mountain lions don't see us as a source of food. Wolves and mountain lions know what their food looks like, it has 4 legs, has a specific body shape and it behaves/moves a certain way. As far as rattlesnakes are concerned, Yellowstone has a very small population of them in a specific area of the park. But the area is kind of out-of-the-way. Only 2 people have been bitten by rattlesnakes during the entire history of Yellowstone National Park and neither of those people died.
  18. I don’t understand the idea of going to a remote trail in a place like Yellowstone and wanting to hear the sounds of birds and waterfalls covered up by Thom Yorke’s familiar moaning. I love listening to music (including TKOL) on suburban and urban trails where the main thing I’d hear if I took out the headphones is the conversations of other people on the trail, in those cases music actually makes me feel more deeply appreciative of nature than if my soundtrack was the Joneses comparing the models of their Teslas or debating politics (to be fair I long since stopped taking the headphones out, so maybe these are not the current topics of discussion), but even in these trails I do feel I’m betraying the place a little by having headphones on because I’d also hear some interesting sounds that I don’t hear due to music. So I draw the line with trails not in cities, and it’s dangerous to have headphones on in those situations too. Aren’t there bears in Yellowstone? Or maybe this is just music you listened to while relaxing at the end of your hikes? Not that I care what Thom Yorke thinks particularly, but I could imagine him not being happy if he learned that his nature inspired song was being listened to as a substitute for the sounds of nature.
  19. Yeah, I love that recording. It was on my iPod playlist during my backcountry hike in Yellowstone last Saturday. In fact, my entire playlist included Radiohead, Thom Yorke solo and Atoms For Peace. I'm finally getting to enjoy all the recordings I acquired during the past year . . . . . listening to them while on adventurous hikes. I'm very grateful for these incredible songs.
  20. Man, I just stumbled on Bloom by just Thom, the Electric Lady studios recordings. 😮
  21. The more I think about it the more fucked up it is that Jonny of all people is endorsing this idea that it’s misogynist to even have unisex bathrooms, something the quintessential unreconstructed macho rock star Springsteen endorsed (to the point of even canceling a tour in NC and incurring financial losses) half a decade ago. What’s misogynist is the way Radiohead’s rep as “important prophetic political voices” or even for some ultra sheltered, non-rock-aware people, “the one rock artist who is politically prophetic” seems to remain intact through the ages no matter how fucking right wing, misogynist, homophobic or racist their actual actions, even at the same time female artists are canceled constantly for overstepping the tiniest boundaries. Like Mitski’s dad, who she is apparently NOT even close to and dissed in her own debut single, supposedly works for the US government in some unknown capacity, and based on this there was a bizarre pizzagate and qanon-like conspiracy that Mitski’s dad engineered numerous genocidal regime changes in the Congo as a CIA agent, which Mitski is somehow to blame for. This conspiracy is still taken seriously by many. Expect to see a bunch of people giving lower ratings to Mitski albums on RYM and Radiohead’s mediocrities rise even higher. And imagine you’re trying to make it as a black woman in rock-adjacent circles, even if you’re a Grammy nominee with a big name like Brittany Howard. You can’t even make one mistake, and at best, you’ll serve as the token woke selections in some racist corporation’s annual BLM playlist. You don’t get the same opportunity to fail upward, every fucking day, like Radiohead have been doing for decades. Jonny isn’t any more of a compositional genius than Mitski or Brittany Howard either. He just rips off stuff that most of his fans are unaware of, like Ravel string quartets and Indian classical music. His range of creativity is pretty damn limited, although he’s well educated in technique.
  22. And this is fucked up when we consider just how much Radiohead and Jonny in particular has often drawn from Arabic music as an influence in his arrangements, as well as the credit Radiohead reaped for being “politically relevant,” with Hail to the Thief and even the vague ass Burn the Witch. BTW was never some kind of anti-racist song, as the band cleverly presented it in 2016 (using Nina Simone to introduce it, asking POC animators to speak on the video and try to draw parallels with Brexit) but at this point given that it’s basically Jonny’s song in the studio version (and one of the few RH songs we all agree doesn’t work super well live), it’s impossible to see its “righteous anger” as anything more than a fascist troll. A Moon Shaped Pool is such a hollow, disingenuous white elephant project. The fact that Thom was uncomfortable in existing publicly without taking a left wing stand speaks to both his ego and his sense of responsibility. If Radiohead had come out as a right wing artist the way Kanye, Morrissey or Novoselic did, yes, Thom’s immediate stature and finances might suffer, but also, the world would not be better, so I’m grateful this didn’t happen. But Radiohead fans can no longer cite Radiohead themselves being left wing if these arguments come up. Radiohead might still be marketed by Thom as a left leaning band, but they are not one. OK Computer was not some brave cry against the machine, it was just some prep school dudes having fun by imitating ‘70s dad rock and calling women piggies. Jonny is no rebel nonconformist, he’s just saying the stuff he was raised to think as a supremely privileged man in England, the most racist/conservative country in world history and the root of almost everything wrong with both the US and Israel. Anglophilia is a disease and Radiohead fans need to acknowledge we fell for that shit.
  23. It sucks because Thom has become such a mediocre solo artist as well as being a huge hypocrite by even his own admission, whereas Jonny has kept a low political profile till now and is consistently pleasing to listen to (if not the innovator some think he is, because they never heard Messiaen, Penderecki, Takemitsu, Debussy and Ravel) but there’s a line Jonny is crossing and I don’t think it’s fair to continue seeing him as apolitical. Thom’s weirdly worded defenses of playing in Israel a few years ago also gave a lot of people including myself an inaccurate idea of Jonny’s family, making it sound like his wife was either part Jewish, part Arab, or even entirely Palestinian yet residing within the borders of Israel, and therefore suggesting that Jonny’s wife had personal experience in being part of the oppressed group that Radiohead were declining to take a stand with. It was the “black friend” defense, and actually less credible than that (“*my bandmate* has a black friend whose feelings you are hurting by calling me a racist”) but at least we kinda felt like there was some personal stake that Jonny’s wife had, versus say Roger Waters ranting from his pedestal of fame. This made us assume that Jonny and his family were one of the many in Israel who (as Thom himself claimed to) stake a middle ground in opposing both the occupation/Netanyahu’s policies AND the international boycott of Israel. In fact most Israeli fans of Radiohead seemed to have that same position. As it turns out though, Jonny and his wife don’t seem to be against Netanyahu or the occupation at all, they reserve all their hatred for the left (including presumably all the left wing Jews who read Haaretz) while oddly trusting the far right white nationalists of Europe (who created the Holocaust). The “Arab Jew” identity Thom called Jonny’s wife is not an Arab in any way, let alone a Palestinian, but rather Jewish, just with origins in Arab-dominant countries rather than Europe. It would be like if you say “hey don’t call me a racist, I’m friends with Grimes and by insulting me, you’re hurting her African American boyfriend’s feelings” and then you learn her “African American” bf is a very conservative white South African. Jonny’s wife may not consider herself white or pass as white, that’s a different issue, and “Arab Jews” are less privileged in Israeli society than lighter skinned Ashkenazi and Sephardic... But what they aren’t is Palestinians or Arabs. If anything Jonny’s wife seems to have anti-Arab racist views, much like many “pied noirs” from French Algeria had more anti-Arab views than French people whose families never lived in Algeria. Jonny’s wife’s ancestors may have lived in areas which were majority-Arab and share food or culture in many ways, but they were not Arab themselves, they are not oppressed by the anti-Palestinian laws and operations of Israel, and she has no particular cred in speaking for, or speaking over, Palestinians or even non-Palestinian advocates for Palestinian rights movements such as BDS.
  24. Thom: #TheShowMustBePaused Jonny and fam: Hold my beer, today’s biggest injustice is the “censorship” of 50 year old TV episodes with racist jokes.
  25. Jonny’s wife liked this tweet: I can only imagine what the vibe is like at Radiohead family get togethers. Maybe Thom and Ed are secretly on the same page and they just pretend to be more left wing on social media and interviews to make their music seem youthful and generate more streams?
  1. Load more activity

  • Create New...